Catch policy issues and improve weak copy in one pass — free, no sign-up.
Paste your ad copy and AdMinefield Pre-Check reads it against two things: the policies Meta, Google and TikTok actually enforce, and how well the copy itself is written. You get two scores, and under them every issue it found — what it is, how many times it hit, and how sure the engine is.
Policy compliance tells you whether this ad can run. Copy quality tells you whether it deserves to: how the argument is built, whether the opening gives anyone a reason to keep reading, whether the whole thing holds to the last line. An ad can pass every rule and still get ignored.
It breaks the copy apart, then reads three times: a surface scan of the words on the page, a meaning read of what they imply, a whole-ad read of what the parts add up to. The call comes after the third.
What people actually read is the copy. Audience, bid and placement can all be changed; everything else in a campaign exists so the right person reads this one line.
So the quality is yours to hold. A tool can draft for you; it can't judge for you — what you can promise, which words your category won't tolerate, whether the line sounds like you.
More of the work is handed to the platforms now; the copy is still yours. This page lays the issues out — which line reads as a promise, where readers stop. What to change, and how, is your call.
Anonymous checks aren't stored and aren't used to train models. Your copy comes back as you wrote it.
Yes. Paste and run, no account needed. Signing in keeps a history of your checks — 10 audits come with the account, write-up included.
Usually one of three: the platform read a line as a promise, the copy doesn't match the landing page, or the product is restricted — often not the word you suspected.
Keyword tools match text. This reads the way a reviewer does, so unusual wording still gets caught.
Meta, Google and TikTok, across eight markets.
For now, yes.
Seconds. Meta’s own review usually finishes within 24 hours.
That's the point — fix it before you spend; fixing an issue costs less than appealing a rejection.